The Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score: a prospective validation study.

BACKGROUND : Assessment of mucosal visualization during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) can be improved with a standardized scoring system. To address this need, we created the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score (TUGCS). METHODS : We developed the TUGCS using Delphi methodology, whereby an international group of endoscopy experts iteratively rated their agreement with proposed TUGCS items and anchors on a 5-point Likert scale. After each Delphi round, we analyzed responses and refined the TUGCS using an 80 % agreement threshold for consensus. We used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess inter-rater and test-retest reliability. We assessed internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and item-total and inter-item correlations with Pearson's correlation coefficient. We compared TUGCS ratings with an independent endoscopist's global rating of mucosal visualization using Spearman's ρ. RESULTS : We achieved consensus with 14 invited participants after three Delphi rounds. Inter-rater reliability was high at 0.79 (95 %CI 0.64-0.88). Test-retest reliability was excellent at 0.83 (95 %CI 0.77-0.87). Cronbach's α was 0.81, item-total correlation range was 0.52-0.70, and inter-item correlation range was 0.38-0.74. There was a positive correlation between TUGCS ratings and a global rating of visualization (r = 0.41, P = 0.002). TUGCS ratings for EGDs with global ratings of excellent were significantly higher than those for EGDs with global ratings of fair (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION : The TUGCS had strong evidence of validity in the clinical setting. The international group of assessors, broad variety of EGD indications, and minimal assessor training improves the potential for dissemination.

Recommendation Reversals in Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Background: Recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) may be reversed when evidence emerges to show they are futile or unsafe. In this study, we identified and characterized recommendation reversals in gastroenterology CPGs. Methods: We searched CPGs published by 20 gastroenterology societies from January 1990 to December 2019. We included guidelines which had at least two iterations of the same topic. We defined reversals as when (a) the more recent iteration of a CPG recommends against a specific practice that was previously recommend in an earlier iteration of a CPG from the same body, and (b) the recommendation in the previous iteration of the CPG is not replaced by a new diagnostic or therapeutic recommendation in the more recent iteration of the CPG. The primary outcome was the number of recommendation reversals. Secondary outcomes included the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence cited for reversals. Results: Twenty societies published 1022 CPGs from 1990 to 2019. Our sample for analysis included 129 unique CPGs. There were 11 recommendation reversals from 10 guidelines. New evidence was presented for 10 recommendation reversals. Meta-analyses were cited for two reversals, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for seven reversals. Recommendations were stronger after the reversal for three cases, weaker in two cases, and of similar strength in three cases. We were unable to compare recommendation strengths for three reversals. Conclusion: Recommendation reversals in gastroenterology CPGs are uncommon but highlight low value or harmful practices.

Perioperative outcome of colorectal cancer and validation of CR-POSSUM in a Caribbean country.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk-adjusted perioperative outcome of colorectal cancer surgery, applying the Colorectal Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity (CR-POSSUM). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery from 2004 to 2007 was done. Data including demographics and physiological data for CR-POSSUM were recorded. Predicted mortality was calculated; validation of CR-POSSUM was done using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve analyses. RESULTS: 232 patients were studied. The overall mean CR-POSSUM score was 18.3+/-3.8 (SD). Predicted mortality was 7.7%, observed mortality was 6.9% and the standardized mortality ratio was 0.9. 34.4% of patients presented with Duke's Stage C or D and had a higher risk of mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.1, 9.1). Emergency surgery was associated with a higher risk of mortality (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5, 14.1). CR-POSSUM calibrated well (Hosmer-Lemeshow Chi-square value 4.3; df: 8; p=0.82) and fairly discriminated outcome as shown by the area under the ROC Curve 0.69, (Standard Error: 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative outcome of colorectal surgery in Trinidad and Tobago is comparable to the developed countries as evaluated by the CR-POSSUM. Patients presenting for emergency surgery and those with advanced stages of cancer had higher perioperative mortality.

Perioperative outcome of colorectal cancer and validation of CR-POSSUM in a Caribbean country

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk-adjusted perioperative outcome of colorectal cancer surgery, applying the Colorectal Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity (CR-POSSUM). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery from 2004 to 2007 was done. Data including demographics and physiological data for CR-POSSUM were recorded. Predicted mortality was calculated; validation of CR-POSSUM was done using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve analyses. RESULTS: 232 patients were studied. The overall mean CR-POSSUM score was 18.3+/-3.8 (SD). Predicted mortality was 7.7%, observed mortality was 6.9% and the standardized mortality ratio was 0.9. 34.4% of patients presented with Duke's Stage C or D and had a higher risk of mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.1, 9.1). Emergency surgery was associated with a higher risk of mortality (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5, 14.1). CR-POSSUM calibrated well (Hosmer-Lemeshow Chi-square value 4.3; df: 8; p=0.82) and fairly discriminated outcome as shown by the area under the ROC Curve 0.69, (Standard Error: 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative outcome of colorectal surgery in Trinidad and Tobago is comparable to the developed countries as evaluated by the CR-POSSUM. Patients presenting for emergency surgery and those with advanced stages of cancer had higher perioperative mortality.